1. Top
  2. Database Top
  3. 1.Event
  4. The 5th  Training Program
  5. Day 1
  6. Overview of IWRM presentation

 

 

 

 

5th NARBO IWRM Training, Keys for Success with IWRM,
18-25 February, Hoi An, Vietnam

▪ Participant Evaluation Sheet for the Award of Certificates of Attendance and Exemplary Completion
Participant’s Name
Affiliation and Country
Evaluator
Evaluator signature and date

▪ Understanding and explanation
Objective
Limited
Adequate
Very good
Excellent
Comment／Evidence
Explain concept of IWRM, especially as it applies to the management of river basins, emphasising its whole-of-water cycle, participatory and trans-disciplinary nature
Show sound understanding of basic climatic, hydrological, ecological, chemical, geo-morphological, engineering, sociological, economic, political, institutional, governance, cultural, educational and participatory concepts relevant to river basin management.
Outline the basic process of IWRM – (e.g. political, governance, legislative, economic, social and cultural characteristics of enabling environment for IWRM; roles for business, government, NGO and community in IWRM) and tools for IWRM (e.g. stakeholder analysis and social assessment; economic assessment; water resource and environmental flows assessment; social change and conflict management; and information management and knowledge exchange )
Provide examples of keys for success in IWRM of river basins gained from the VGTB case study and those presented by other participants
UPWARD

▪ Analysis
Objective
Limited
Adequate
Very good
Excellent
Comment／Evidence
Undertake a situation analysis for a given river basin case study (in this case the Vu Gia-Thu Bon (VGTB) Basin), synthesising the hydrological, biophysical, social, cultural, economic, political and governance dimensions of the river basin to give a concise basin overview

▪ Critical Evaluation
Objective
Limited
Adequate
Very good
Excellent
Comment／Evidence
Critically evaluate the VGTB case study and be able to present this evaluation in terms of barriers and enablers to IWRM in the basin using a “What? So what? Now what?” approach, highlighting directions of better management of the basin

▪ Application
Objective
Limited
Adequate
Very good
Excellent
Comment／Evidence
Explain how these keys for success may be applied in their own situation
Explain how they will use a MERI (monitoring, evaluating, reporting and improving) approach to their own RBO work
Document how they will work with other participants post-workshop to implement these keys for success in their situation
UPWARD

▪ Use of tools
Objective
Limited
Adequate
Very good
Excellent
Comment／Evidence
Use Concept, an eWater CRC conceptual model,
Use other relevant Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) tools  to explain cause and effect interactions between components of catchments

▪ Feedback
Objective
Limited
Adequate
Very good
Excellent
Comment／Evidence
Provide constructive feedback on the effectiveness of the training in meeting their expectations
Provide direction for further NARBO RBO Training.
Poster comments
ndividual presentation comments
Invited participant presentation comments
Participation comments
Overall comments from evaluator
UPWARD

The award of rankings such as "Limited", "Adequate", "Very Good", and "Excellent" should all be supported by evidence observed at the Training.

e.g. Explanations offered at the training showing understanding and ability to apply new concepts; ability to synthesise information from the diverse sources presented; ability to apply this synthesis of knowledge to their own situation; ability to critique material presented; willingness to participate actively in the training activities; quality of the poster presentation and individual presentations; feedback offered on behalf of groups and the quality of the paper the participant submits to NARBO.

"Limited" means the participant has not or only partially achieved an objective.

"Adequate" means the participant has sound understanding of the objective or, in the case of application objectives, is functional in application of the ideas presented.

"Very good" means that the participant has achieved the objective to a higher standard than that generally reached by others.

"Excellent" means that that the participant is operating at a level that exceeds most other participants.

A Certificate of Exemplary Completion should only be awarded to those participants who achieve rankings of "Very Good" to "Excellent" in 10 of the 13 objectives listed. An exemplary participant should not achieve below a ranking of "Very Good" in the areas Critical Evaluation and Application.

 

Dr Peter Oliver B.Sc(Hons) Dip. Ed. M.Ed. PhD

IWC Senior Lecturer

(Education and Training)
UPWARD